<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: The Wolfman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cinemaverdict.com/2010/02/15/review-the-wolfman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cinemaverdict.com/2010/02/15/review-the-wolfman/</link>
	<description>Spreading film criticism all over the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 15:24:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.cinemaverdict.com/2010/02/15/review-the-wolfman/comment-page-1/#comment-1716</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinemaverdict.com/?p=1729#comment-1716</guid>
		<description>I have just seen the film and, on a 10-point scale, can hardly come up to 5, to be frank. I kept my expectations realistic I felt, but the pacing was sluggish, the Talbot&#039;s were altered such that it hardly constitutes a &quot;remake&quot;. I could be ok with that, just that the motivations of the updated characters were empty in my belief. And I am a huge fan of the horror genre, particularly the old school Universal. Did I expect it to be a recycling of the 1941 classic? No, and desired that it not be. But, apart from the magnificent transformations courtesy of the brillant make-up artist Rick Baker, the storyline was weak and lacked pacing. Again, without high expectations I felt it could have been done--5 stars, but I did enjoy it nonetheless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just seen the film and, on a 10-point scale, can hardly come up to 5, to be frank. I kept my expectations realistic I felt, but the pacing was sluggish, the Talbot&#8217;s were altered such that it hardly constitutes a &#8220;remake&#8221;. I could be ok with that, just that the motivations of the updated characters were empty in my belief. And I am a huge fan of the horror genre, particularly the old school Universal. Did I expect it to be a recycling of the 1941 classic? No, and desired that it not be. But, apart from the magnificent transformations courtesy of the brillant make-up artist Rick Baker, the storyline was weak and lacked pacing. Again, without high expectations I felt it could have been done&#8211;5 stars, but I did enjoy it nonetheless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manilaman</title>
		<link>http://www.cinemaverdict.com/2010/02/15/review-the-wolfman/comment-page-1/#comment-1710</link>
		<dc:creator>Manilaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinemaverdict.com/?p=1729#comment-1710</guid>
		<description>A nice review Daniel, which more or less reflects my own opinions about the film. 

I have read several reviews of the film and what with its convoluted production history, it seems to me that far too many critics have ended-up reviewing the film that was playing in their heads rather than the film that was playing on the screen.  Always a dangerous thing to do.  

One critic even complained about the lack of depth.  In a werewolf movie?  Give me a break!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A nice review Daniel, which more or less reflects my own opinions about the film. </p>
<p>I have read several reviews of the film and what with its convoluted production history, it seems to me that far too many critics have ended-up reviewing the film that was playing in their heads rather than the film that was playing on the screen.  Always a dangerous thing to do.  </p>
<p>One critic even complained about the lack of depth.  In a werewolf movie?  Give me a break!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Carlton</title>
		<link>http://www.cinemaverdict.com/2010/02/15/review-the-wolfman/comment-page-1/#comment-1708</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Carlton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 03:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinemaverdict.com/?p=1729#comment-1708</guid>
		<description>Great review!   I saw this earlier today and while I didn&#039;t care for it as much as you, I certainly wasn&#039;t bored.   The transformations looked fabulous, but the jump scares grew old quickly.  It&#039;s always nice to see Hopkins playing  Hopkins.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review!   I saw this earlier today and while I didn&#8217;t care for it as much as you, I certainly wasn&#8217;t bored.   The transformations looked fabulous, but the jump scares grew old quickly.  It&#8217;s always nice to see Hopkins playing  Hopkins.  <img src='http://www.cinemaverdict.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
