<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Angels &amp; Demons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cinemaverdict.com/2009/05/17/review-angels-demons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cinemaverdict.com/2009/05/17/review-angels-demons/</link>
	<description>Spreading film criticism all over the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Stailey</title>
		<link>http://www.cinemaverdict.com/2009/05/17/review-angels-demons/comment-page-1/#comment-858</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Stailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 09:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinemaverdict.com/?p=805#comment-858</guid>
		<description>Not having seen DA VINCI CODE, I was warned about how disastrous it was and the potential mine field ANGELS &amp; DEMONS might be. Like Clark, I was surprised at Ron Howard&#039;s ability to maintain a breakneck pace, despite the voluminous exposition dumped upon us by screenwriters David Koepp and Akiva Goldsman -- the former showed real promise, before hooking up with Steven Spielberg; and the latter has been torturing us for quite some time . Credit the real thrust of the picture to composer Hans Zimmer who envelops us in a thick tapestry of impending religious doomsday. Sure, there was a great deal of hokum involved, but since everybody involved played along, nothing within this Dan Brown inspired universe seemed too out of place. The thing that I found curious is that ANGELS &amp; DEMONS the novel was a prequel to THE DA VINCI CODE, something they chose not to adhere to in the film version. No matter. If you can forgive the cheese, it&#039;s worth taking the ride.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not having seen DA VINCI CODE, I was warned about how disastrous it was and the potential mine field ANGELS &#038; DEMONS might be. Like Clark, I was surprised at Ron Howard&#8217;s ability to maintain a breakneck pace, despite the voluminous exposition dumped upon us by screenwriters David Koepp and Akiva Goldsman &#8212; the former showed real promise, before hooking up with Steven Spielberg; and the latter has been torturing us for quite some time . Credit the real thrust of the picture to composer Hans Zimmer who envelops us in a thick tapestry of impending religious doomsday. Sure, there was a great deal of hokum involved, but since everybody involved played along, nothing within this Dan Brown inspired universe seemed too out of place. The thing that I found curious is that ANGELS &#038; DEMONS the novel was a prequel to THE DA VINCI CODE, something they chose not to adhere to in the film version. No matter. If you can forgive the cheese, it&#8217;s worth taking the ride.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
