TIFF Review: Martyrs

September 18th, 2008 by adam arseneau · 5 Comments · Film Festival, Reviews · Print This Post

Martyrs - Theatrical Poster

Martyrs
Opening Date: n/a
TRAILER: Trailer
ACCOMPLICES: Official Site

The Charge
martyr (Greek μάρτυς “witness”)

Opening Statement
It took me days to summon the courage to even write about Martyrs. The French need to be quarantined before their cinematic horror films destroy us all.

Facts of the Case
A young girl, Lucie (Mylène Jampanoï) is found bloody, tortured and half-naked, nearly catatonic from unspoken horrors and placed into a hospital for emotional rehabilitation. As she grows up under care, she learns to function again with the help of her friend, Anna (Morjana Alaoui). The two girls become fast friends, and Anna is committed to helping Lucie purge her demons, no matter the cost.

Fifteen years later, Lucie is out for vengeance, seeking out those who kept her chained up so many years ago. With Anna’s help, she tracks down the family responsible for her torture—or so she believes—and reaps terror upon them. But the further Lucie descends into revenge, the more confusing events become for both girls. Sinister forces are at work.

martyrs.jpg

The Evidence
Martyrs is destined to become an infamous film before people even get to see it. After being hit by the French equivalent of an NC-17 rating, France’s Society of Film Directors jumped on the protest wagon to attack the ratings board and get the film shown. Considering that this rating has never been dropped on a genre film in all of French cinematic rating history, it was quite the hum-drum. People are going to hear about this film, amazing things like “the film so scary that France tried to ban it!” and all manner of silliness. To set the record straight: Martyrs is a unsettling film, but it is not the penultimate horror film.

It’s something entirely worse.

There are two distinct films at work in Martyrs, and each one has their pros and cons, but both are out vying for the intellectual destruction of the other. It makes for an interesting cinematic experience to say the least; like having lunch with homicidal in-laws. The first part is a by-the-book horror film, the kind the French have been getting very good at making as of late: lots of blood, lots of gore, a crazy incongruous plot full of screams and jumps and a terrible disregard for human life. Just as the audience is starting to get warmed up to it, surprise! Another movie appears right when you would expect Martyrs to end. It runs on for a long time, brutally dragging out an already torturous horror experience into… something. It becomes something entirely uncomfortable and disorienting; something upsetting and visceral and mean.

I have never seen or heard of a horror film quite like Martyrs. Lauded and hyped-up to be “the” definitive French horror film, a film so emotionally wrenching and shocking to put the current crowning champion, Inside (À l’intérieur) out to pasture. Well, no, not even close; Inside is still the “oops-I-crapped-my-pants” champion of intense French horror in my book for on-screen violence. That’s not to say that Martyrs doesn’t terrify the hell right out of me. It just does it it in a wholly unexpected fashion.

As horror films go, Martyrs has the right stuff—a nice plot that borders on the absurd without actually being so, crazy shotgun-toting protagonists who shoot a whole lot of people full of holes, and a creepy monster tale that slowly metabolizes into view. Then, the ground opens up, and we go from the standard slash-and-scream film into something David Cronenberg would huddle in a corner after seeing. Martyrs is profoundly upsetting, in part because of this horrendous 180-degree shift; audiences reeled at the screening like they had just gotten whiplash. The cheers and cries of fear and delight at the carnage and gore and chases were soon replaced by awkward squirming, wandering gazes and uncomfortable silences. There were more than a few boos after the screening, and with good reason.

Once you have seen the film, you will understand, but without spoiling every bit of the story, it is difficult to truly explore and dissect exactly why Martyrs is so disorienting to audiences. Imagine if in the finale of The Sopranos, the cast suddenly started to sing and dance in a Rodgers and Hammerstein-styled musical number with kisses and hugs and fireworks… and then the show ended. Audiences would be in shock. Sure, there is a noticeable lack of singing, kissing and hugging in Martyrs, but this style of emotional derailment has been harnessed quite brutally. We go full-tilt from a mindless slasher film into a profound and disorienting examination about sin, pain, the afterlife, human tolerances for torture and the notion of martyrdom in one of the most uncomfortable and unsettling thirty minutes of film I have ever bore witness to.

This film digs deep. The disruptive finale tarnishes Martyrs from being a “great” film by the traditional definition, but director Pascal Laugier has sacrificed his own film in order to explore something else entirely; something primal and disturbing that transcends the simplistic set-up of his own film. Before audiences even realize it, we are trapped in a windowless room, being tortured and beaten and mutilated beyond all recognition. And that’s about as close as spoilers as I’m prepared to go.

Forget mindlessness—Martyrs tries to put a method to the madness of modern-style torture porn, and it just makes your skin crawl. The “torture porn” genre survives on its camp, its inherent absurdity and its removal from reality. Imagine the same on-screen brutality laden with existentialism and philosophical meandering as to why all these teenagers needed to be dismembered slowly, agonizingly, and with great prejudice, and then did it again and again and again. Trying to explain such madness just makes it so much more upsetting, so much more real. There’s torture, and then there’s the crazy @#$% going on in Martyrs, and the latter is so much worse.

Closing Statement
This is one of those rare occasions where a film has inspired a negative reaction in me, but in doing so has actually endeared me to the film. Many people will be turned off by the sudden unexpected tonal shift in Martyrs, expecting simply to have their external senses tortured and tweaked, but Martyrs goes much, much deeper. This is a torturous film in the most literal sense of the word; making it through is tantamount to punishment. But in a good way—really, it’s hard to explain. Fans of deeply visceral and introspective horror will definitely want to give Martyrs a look.

It is unlikely Martyrs will receive theatrical release in this country, but The Weinstein Company has purchased distribution rights to the film, so keep an eye out on the Dimension Extreme label in months to come—a DVD release is all but assured. Then, you can watch Martyrs back-to-back with Inside and never leave your house again.

The Verdict
Mind-numbingly unsettling, but a turning point in horror cinema for fans that can stomach it.

7/10

Share and Enjoy:
  • e-mail
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Fark
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis

Tags: ······

5 responses so far ↓

  • 1 WiredRacing // Sep 25, 2008 at 10:43 am

    I think it’s better than the reviewer indicates. I also think while it certainly contains ‘Torture Porn’-like scenes, there are key differences and the film as a whole.. “okays” it.

    Nothing put on screen here (especially after the half way point) is for anyone’s sick enjoyment.

    This is a horror movie with a point.

  • 2 RamblinSydRumpo // Jan 27, 2009 at 11:40 am

    10/10 for Martyrs. Inside is nowhere near as good a film. Starts promisingly but degenerates into a stupid splatterfest which makes absolutely no sense. Ludicrous exercise.
    Martyrs on the other hand is one of the best horror films in decades. I found it extremely moving. A stunning achievement.

  • 3 Axle // Jun 3, 2009 at 12:36 pm

    Martyrs is an interesting film, disturbing and thought provoking. As a horror movie, it has done its job–which may be the most one should ask of a horror movie. After all, what is the purpose of the horror genre? To be shocked, startled, reviled, disgusted in the safety of one’s family room or the local theater. Entertainment.

    However, it is odd to me how some people seem to find “greatness” in Martyrs. This is not a great film. I do like the acting, the camera work and editing are technically competent, the sound and music good–which quite a few horror films lack! Martyrs is a well-crafted movie in the Hollywood style. (It IS made in the Hollywood style–Media Studies majors get over it…) But, the grand epiphany that supposedly comes through intense and prolonged physical pain as seen in the photographs of other tortured people throughout history, although intriguing, is not supported well enough in the script to overcome my willing suspension of disbelief. The cellar hallway scene, of course, with the Cult’s leader explaining to the main character the need for torture with the photo album (despite the fact that the same larger photos are on the walls next to the actors) is almost comical in its brevity. The film would have been creepier had it delved into the occult and the mysterious efforts of alchemists…or, say, if the secret organization were financed by the Vatican. We’re not told, and I think to the film’s detriment. How can martyrdom be talked about without religion. And, how can torture be rationalized without some self-serving (most would coin this kind of enterprise as evil) intent? Of course, anyone thinking that the male torturer and the others are just “doing their jobs” would probably find “the whole Nazi thing” to be no big deal….

    No. What horrifies me about this kind of film is that it glorifies a false intellectualism that treats graphic torture in a relative light. I’m not as worried about “American Rednecks” loving this film as much as the mildly educated 20-somethings who think that they have stumbled upon something deep in this “wicked Euro-flick”–which they’ll probably buy and place next to their TOOL CDs….

  • 4 somebody // Jul 6, 2009 at 5:14 pm

    “Martyrs is a unsettling film, but it is not the penultimate horror film.”

    It is not the second to the last horror film? You mean there probably will be more than one horror film after it?

  • 5 The voice of reason // Dec 6, 2009 at 3:24 pm

    F**k. I actually turned to the person at the side of me and apologised to them for making them watch such a god awful, sickeningly disgraceful piece of cinema. What the hell is wrong with the french? Its not daring, its not artful and it certainly isnt worthy of committing to film. Its retentious, disgusting and wrong, plain wrong. What kind of a world do we live in where we can condone such films to continue to be made? Think of all the struggling writers/directors out there who have to fight tooth and nail to ahve their work made, when lets face it all you really have to do is create an excercise in the breaking of the human spirit and then try and pass it off as existential french shit. This made me sad, sad that i would spend money on it, sad that the people in it didint have the sense to smell evil when they put their names to it and sad that no matter what i say these ‘torture porn’ films will continue to be churned out. the only thing that sets this aside from any other (hostel 1/2, Saw 1-6 etc) is that this time they conveniently masked the pointlessness in some ‘religious’ shroud of misguidance. Ridiculous, terrible, shocking and mind numbingly sad. I felt dirty after watching it, anyone that condones this film or actually took away with them some kind of joy or excitement from watching it should be sterilised, and that goes for the director. Oh, and yes….i got the message, i understood the point, i appreciated how well it was shot and how it played with the audiences reconcetions of run-of-the-mill horror genre…and you know what? It was still the worst thign i have ever seen. My comments will no doubt inspire others to watch it, my only advice is….it will be 108 minutes of your life that you will never get back and will leave you a little sadder inside if this is a taste of cinema future

Leave a Comment