<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Swing Vote</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cinemaverdict.com/2008/08/09/review-swing-vote/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cinemaverdict.com/2008/08/09/review-swing-vote/</link>
	<description>Spreading film criticism all over the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:16:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sandrar</title>
		<link>http://www.cinemaverdict.com/2008/08/09/review-swing-vote/comment-page-1/#comment-1078</link>
		<dc:creator>sandrar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinemaverdict.com/2008/08/09/review-swing-vote/#comment-1078</guid>
		<description>Hi! I was surfing and found your blog post... nice! I love your blog.  :) Cheers! Sandra. R.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi! I was surfing and found your blog post&#8230; nice! I love your blog.  <img src='http://www.cinemaverdict.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Cheers! Sandra. R.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene</title>
		<link>http://www.cinemaverdict.com/2008/08/09/review-swing-vote/comment-page-1/#comment-311</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 23:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinemaverdict.com/2008/08/09/review-swing-vote/#comment-311</guid>
		<description>I watched the movie yesterday and come pretty much down at the same place. This was a good little story and Costner &amp; Company had an affable. light touch. I disagree about Winningham&#039;s performance however. You may say her presence in the plot wasn&#039;t needed (it was not critical), but she delivered it very well for such a short of amount of screen time. Compare that to Nana Visitor&#039;s brief scene as Hopper&#039;s conscience. You began to understand Costner&#039;s character and situation better after &quot;meeting the wife&quot;.  Judge Rheingold&#039;s performance was quirky if only because it didn&#039;t seem like him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched the movie yesterday and come pretty much down at the same place. This was a good little story and Costner &amp; Company had an affable. light touch. I disagree about Winningham&#8217;s performance however. You may say her presence in the plot wasn&#8217;t needed (it was not critical), but she delivered it very well for such a short of amount of screen time. Compare that to Nana Visitor&#8217;s brief scene as Hopper&#8217;s conscience. You began to understand Costner&#8217;s character and situation better after &#8220;meeting the wife&#8221;.  Judge Rheingold&#8217;s performance was quirky if only because it didn&#8217;t seem like him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
