<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Prince Caspian</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cinemaverdict.com/2008/05/19/review-prince-caspian/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cinemaverdict.com/2008/05/19/review-prince-caspian/</link>
	<description>Spreading film criticism all over the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:16:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jose M.</title>
		<link>http://www.cinemaverdict.com/2008/05/19/review-prince-caspian/comment-page-1/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 14:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinemaverdict.com/2008/05/19/review-prince-caspian/#comment-148</guid>
		<description>This movie is darker than LWW (I think of it as the Chamber of Secrets, on how darker it is)...is not as engaging, and yes, the Caspian character is underwritten, but it holds up the franchise. I&#039;ve heard several reviews that say that this book is short and not that interesting, so they made this a better movie than it should&#039;ve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This movie is darker than LWW (I think of it as the Chamber of Secrets, on how darker it is)&#8230;is not as engaging, and yes, the Caspian character is underwritten, but it holds up the franchise. I&#8217;ve heard several reviews that say that this book is short and not that interesting, so they made this a better movie than it should&#8217;ve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.cinemaverdict.com/2008/05/19/review-prince-caspian/comment-page-1/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 23:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinemaverdict.com/2008/05/19/review-prince-caspian/#comment-135</guid>
		<description>the makers of Prince Caspian kept to the original story surprisingly well... i heard they were going to make it into a silly pure-action flick, but thankfully this was not the case</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the makers of Prince Caspian kept to the original story surprisingly well&#8230; i heard they were going to make it into a silly pure-action flick, but thankfully this was not the case</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Peters</title>
		<link>http://www.cinemaverdict.com/2008/05/19/review-prince-caspian/comment-page-1/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 13:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinemaverdict.com/2008/05/19/review-prince-caspian/#comment-88</guid>
		<description>I thought one of the film&#039;s biggest flaws was how under-written Caspian was. The outcome would have been the same without him. He was important to help restore Narnia, but you don&#039;t get that in the film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought one of the film&#8217;s biggest flaws was how under-written Caspian was. The outcome would have been the same without him. He was important to help restore Narnia, but you don&#8217;t get that in the film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
